Indian Journal of Dermatology
  Publication of IADVL, WB
  Official organ of AADV
Indexed with Science Citation Index (E) , Web of Science and PubMed
Users online: 2539  
Home About  Editorial Board  Current Issue Archives Online Early Coming Soon Guidelines Subscriptions  e-Alerts    Login  
    Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Print this page Email this page
Year : 2003  |  Volume : 48  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 18-21

Dexamethasone Cyclophosphamide Pulse Therapy In Pemphigus- A Five Year Retrospective Study

Correspondence Address:
Alka Dogra

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

The present retrospective study comprised 71 patients of pemphigus enrolled for dexamethasone- cyclophosphamide or plain dexamethasone pulse therapy between January 1997 to December 2001. Ten patients were lost to follow up, 2. expired and treatement was withheld in 2 patients due to side effects. Fifty-seven patients are on regular follow up. The type of pemphigus was P. vulgaris in 48, P. foliaceous in 6, P. erythematosus in I and P. herpetiformis in 2. Of 57 patients, 2 were in phase –1,3 in phase II, 9 phase – III and 43 phase – IV treatment. The type of pemphigus and the duration of the disease were found to influence the response to treatment. Main side effects encountered included candidiasis, diarrhoea, pyodermas, facial flushing, dermatophytosis and hiccups. Pulse therapy had to be stopped in 2 patients, because of cataract and psychosis in one patient each. Serious side effects seen were pancytopenia in one patient and septicaemia in another, both of whom died. Relapse was seen in 2 patients.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded114    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal